Todays Guardian gives an unfavourably biased account of Julian Assange - no mention that the “attacks” were military personnel killing innocent civilians as a fun game or that the rape accusations disappeared into the ether when they were discredited as a set-up to incarcerate an innocent man. Shame on The Guardian for misrepresenting these in order to continue to blacken the reputation of a decent & courageous man.
Disappointed by the Guardian coverage, not for the first time!
I agree with saying the US and UK are not Liberal Démocracies. In fact they cannot be classed as démocraties either, since in both countries, the winning party is elected by less than half the votes, and quite often, in the US, not even by a majority, because of the Electoral collège system.
Todays Guardian gives an unfavourably biased account of Julian Assange - no mention that the “attacks” were military personnel killing innocent civilians as a fun game or that the rape accusations disappeared into the ether when they were discredited as a set-up to incarcerate an innocent man. Shame on The Guardian for misrepresenting these in order to continue to blacken the reputation of a decent & courageous man.
Disappointed by the Guardian coverage, not for the first time!
I agree with saying the US and UK are not Liberal Démocracies. In fact they cannot be classed as démocraties either, since in both countries, the winning party is elected by less than half the votes, and quite often, in the US, not even by a majority, because of the Electoral collège system.