Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Simon A Bird's avatar

Probably a case where popular sovereignty could and would deliver a good result. Think of other example of popular sovereignty/referendum in recent history which did the exact opposite...

Expand full comment
IVAN's avatar

Hetty is 100% correct. Devolution is merely an extension of Colonial Administration as developed by Luggard.

See https://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/tburke1/8bsyllabus/dualmandate.html

And you will find

"The native treasurer keeps all accounts of receipts and expenditure, and the Emir, with the assistance of the Resident, annually prepares a budget, which is formally approved by the Lieut.-Governor."

The Scots are the "natives"

The Liet-Governor is Alister Jack

The Emir is Humza

Time also for Alex Salmon to "man-up" and admit Devolution is now, as it has always been, a colonial control method bent on territorial wealth extraction, not any form of democracy for the Scots "natives".

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts